Trump ban on media outlets:
A few days ago, the President of the USA, Donald Trump, banned the news outlets CNN, MS Now, and Politico from White House. It escalated the long-running confrontation with the American press. This ban intensified the attack on media and freedom of expression. The journalists from the three media groups stated that they were turned away at the White House and that their access to the entrance was unregistered. This announcement from Trump was made a day ago, and it triggered these major media groups. Trump targeted these media groups and accused them of spreading fake news. But he never cited a specific case or proof. He also said that he wants to extend these bars as far as possible (financial time).
The media group reaction:
The three major media outlet groups reacted to the action very firmly. CNN argued that its news was always true and had never released any fake news. Never done any other kind of fake reporting. However, this ban on the media group is a contradiction of their constitutional right to report without any resistance from the government. On the other hand, Politico also refused this accusation of fake reporting and said it will continue to report fairly on White House news; also, they vowed to defend their First Amendment right to report against any report that restricts them. Trump’s ban also triggered the MS Now media group. MS Now, formerly known as MSNBC, declined to comment on the decision.
Trump’s Justification: “Fake News” Claims:
President Trump has backed his decision to ban media outlets by stating that these outlets were spreading false news. According to the Financial Times, he said that the news outlets, including CNN, Politico, and MS Now ( also known as MSNBC), are barred due to their recurring posts and fake news spread.
Trump argued that when the media outlets are posting or covering the national news or their president’s news, they should not write fiction or share fake news ( In a post on Social Truth. President Trump said mainly three media outlets should not have their journalist or any team members inside his building (Financial Times). These justifications also contradict the white house’s own statements that it made earlier. The white house always mentioned Donald Trump as the most transparent president in the history of the United States, but the bar Trump sets for the media outlets contradicts the earlier statements by the White House.
Constitutional Questions and Legal Precedent:
The First Amendment contradicts the ban on the media outlets, and these media groups have already made their objections under this constitutional right. The media outlet have already stated their stance on this issue, and based on legal and constitutional backing,p they are taking a stance against this ban. They are saying this accusation of fake news spread is totally fake and there is no proof against them. Banning is simply against their legal right to spread the news to the nation.
Financial Times mentioned Seth Stern of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, who argued that it is the most violent act against the First Amendment right of the media, and there is no worse act than stopping the media from criticizing the government.
The Rise of “New Media” in the White House Briefing Room
Alongside banning the media outlets, including CNN and Politico, the white house is determining who will ask questions and whose questions will be answered. According to a critique in the Financial Times, the government is giving its first question-asking policy to the media outlets that are pro-Trump influencers or bloggers rather than reporters, in their semi-regular press conference. This change matters the most because the first question always sets the tone of the conference and shapes the topic of the conference.
It will give the white house the control over the information spread and news control.
Final Results:
President Donald Trump’s ban on news outlets, including CNN, MS Now, and Politico, violates these media groups’ rights under the First Amendment. Although the media outlets resisted the act. They have confirmed that the accusation of spreading fake news is totally fake and pointless. This act also contradicts the White House messages to the public that Trump is the most transparent President of the USA, but he still refuses to report to some of the major media outlets. Financial Times analyzes this as an act of controlling the spread of information and media control. There are still reports going on.
You can also get more information from uknewsupdate.com